CDR Potential and IPCC Accounting

IPCC inventory method

IPCC 2019 Refinement Vol. 4 Appendix 4 provides a method for estimating biochar C in mineral cropland/grassland soils (PDF · estimates soil C stock change from biochar).

F_perm after 100 years (conservative ~20 °C basis in appendix notes):

Temperature classF_perm
Low (350–450 °C)0.65
Medium (450–600 °C)0.80
High (>600 °C / high-T gasification)0.89

Uncertainty roughly ±11–15%. Guidance / basis for future Tier 1—not a credit methodology. See Verra VM0044, Puro CORC200+, etc. for market methods.

models soil GHG from biochar extends this with H/C_org and soil-temperature predictors. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c02425.

Mitigation / CDR potential estimates

SourceEstimate
Woolf et al. 2010Max 1.8 Pg CO₂-Cₑ yr⁻¹ (≈ ~6.6 Pg CO₂e if ×44/12); century total 130 Pg CO₂-Cₑ. Prefer reviews biochar climate mitigation / Weng 2025 for updated framing.
Lehmann et al. 2021Emission reductions 3.4–6.3 Pg CO₂e yr⁻¹ (~half CDR); residues-only 2.4–3.9; with land sparing + CCS up to ~7.4–10.3
Weng & Cowie 2025Literature 0.03–11; credible multi-Gt scale
State of CDR 2026 (Fuss & Lunstrum) · CDR costs and potentialsSustainable removal ≤~2.7 GtCO₂ yr⁻¹; total mitigation ≤~10.3; IAM 2050 <0.1–1.1
Costs (Fuss & Lunstrum 2026)Often ~10–345

LCA / system boundaries

Net climate benefit is dominated by biochar C permanence vs baseline biomass fate, modulated by methane avoidance (rice, landfill), energy co-products, transport, and kiln CH₄ if poorly engineered (Roberts et al. 2010 onward; Matuštík et al. 2020 review; Lehmann 2021).

State of CDR (2026) and Weng & Cowie (2025) place biochar as largest current novel CDR contributor with gigaton-scale technical/sustainable potential but much lower near-term economic/IAM deployment.

MRV accounting insight (science side)

MRV can focus on mass produced × C fraction × permanence factor at the kiln/gate, with application verification—cheaper than full soil flux monitoring (Lehmann 2021). Markets implement this differently—see MRV Stack.