Key Sources

Primary and high-signal references used in this vault. Don’t invent papers, DOIs, volumes, or prices beyond this list and the linked notes. Rule: every data claim in a note carries an outbound https://… or https://doi.org/… link, not only a [[wikilink]].

Source notes

The most-cited papers and reports each have their own note in Sources/. Each note holds the figures the vault uses from that source, where in the source each figure appears, and whether it was checked against the full text or only the abstract. Topic notes link to these notes instead of restating the numbers, and each source note’s backlinks (Obsidian’s backlinks pane, or the Backlinks section on the published site) list the notes that rely on it.

Transclude of Source-Index.base

Corrections made while building the source notes (2026-09-14)

Cited asProblemFix
Ye et al. 2020DOI 10.1111/sum.12555 is a different paperhttps://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12546 · meta-analyzes yields with fertilizer controls
Archanjo et al. 2017DOI ending 01.038 didn’t resolvehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.037
Ndoung et al. 2021One link used e08501, an unrelated medical paperhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08473
Jaiswal et al. 2014DOI ending 10.047 is an unrelated priming paperhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.051
Vandecasteele et al. 2016DOI ending 11.059 is a paper on VOCs in surface coatingshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.045
”Gale 2021” post-processing meta-analysisCrossref lists the author as ThomasThomas (2021) — https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00115-0
”Marschner et al. 2022” N-uptake reviewCrossref lists the authors as Rasse et al.Rasse et al. (2022) — https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05365-w
”Fuss et al. 2026”The chapter has two authorsCDR costs and potentials
Wang et al. 2016Cited for “short-term positive priming”; the paper found negative priming in short studiesmeta-analyzes stability and priming
Jia et al. 2023Called “field-focused”; it pools lab, pot and field studiesglobal GHG and yield patterns
Kammann et al. 2015”+305%” and “3–5 g NO₃⁻-N kg⁻¹”Up to 305% of the control; ~2.1–5.2 g kg⁻¹ depending on method — shows co-compost nitrate capture
Earth Foundries report”10% biochar”10% by volume — reports Napa CASP co-composting
Quilliam et al. 2013 clover caveatComes from a different Quilliam paperhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1411-4
CategoryResourceURL
Market trackerCDR.fyi homehttps://www.cdr.fyi/
Market trackerBiochar Snapshot 2025https://www.cdr.fyi/blog/biochar-carbon-removal-market-snapshot-2025
Market tracker2024 Year in Reviewhttps://www.cdr.fyi/blog/2024-year-in-review
Market trackerQ1 2026 Durable CDR Updatehttps://www.cdr.fyi/blog/2026-q1-durable-cdr-market-update-from-promise-to-proof
IndexPuro CORCX / CORCCHARhttps://puro.earth/buy-carbon-credits/removal-certificate-corc/carbon-removal-indexes/
RegistryPuro Registryhttps://registry.puro.earth/
MethodologyVerra VM0044 v1.2https://verra.org/methodologies/vm0044-biochar-utilization-in-soil-and-non-soil-applications-v1-2/
MethodologyIsometric Biochar Protocol v1.3https://registry.isometric.com/protocol/biochar/1.3
MethodologyCSI Global Biochar C-Sink 3.3 PDFhttps://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000039EN.pdf
MethodologyCSI service pagehttps://www.carbon-standards.com/en/standards/service-501~global-biochar-c-sink.html
MethodologyCSI formulas & EFshttps://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000115EN.pdf
RegistryGlobal C-Sink Registryhttps://global-c-registry.org/
Product standardEBC Standard 10.5E PDFhttps://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000093EN.pdf
IntegrityICVCM CSI program applicationhttps://icvcm.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Global-C-Sink-Copy-of-application_2026_05_18.pdf
IntegrityICVCM homehttps://www.icvcm.org/
IntegrityICVCM Puro CCP-Eligiblehttps://www.icvcm.org/integrity-council-confirms-carbon-crediting-program-puro-earth-as-ccp-eligible/
IntegrityICVCM VM0044 CCP decision PDFhttps://icvcm.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/M43_VCS_VM0044_v1.2_2025.pdf
ScienceIPCC 2019 biochar appendix PDFhttps://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/pdf/4_Volume4/19R_V4_Ch02_Ap4_Biochar.pdf · estimates soil C stock change from biochar
Product standardEBChttps://www.european-biochar.org/
Product standardEBC Guidelines 10.5E PDFhttps://www.european-biochar.org/media/doc/7/ebc_en_10_5_red.pdf
Product standardIBIhttps://biochar-international.org/
PolicyNRCS CPS 336 FAQ (April 2026)https://nrcs-prod.azureedge.us/sites/default/files/2026-04/soil-carbon-amendment-ac-336-faq.pdf · answers CPS 336 planning questions
PolicyNRCS CPS 336 standard (November 2022)https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-11/336-NHCP-CPS-Soil-Carbon-Amendment-2022.pdf · defines NRCS practice 336
PolicyABI NRCS funding quick guide (2026)https://biochar.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Biochar-Guidelines-Funding-2026-final.pdf
Industry orgAmerican Biochar Institute (ex-USBI)https://biochar.org/about-abi/ · US Biochar Initiative
Industry orgUSBI → ABI welcomehttps://biochar.org/usbi/
StandardANSI/ASABE/USBI S668https://biochar.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/ANSI-S668.pdf · standardizes biochar lab testing
Market reportABI 2025 U.S. Biochar Market Reporthttps://biochar.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2025-United-States-Biochar-Market-Report.pdf · surveys the US biochar market
GuidanceABI Ag Guidelines 2026https://biochar.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Biochar-Guidelines-for-Agriculture-Applications-2026.pdf
GuidanceUSBI Ag Guidelines 2023 (Farmland Info)https://farmlandinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/06/usbi-biochar-guidelines-for-ag-application.pdf · guides farm biochar application
PolicyEU CRCF Delegated Reg. 2026/285https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32026R0285

Prefer these live pages for markets, pricing, registries, and standards.

Literature without a source note

Each entry appears once. Author names, years, and journals match Crossref as of 2026-09-14. Papers and reports that have a source note are in the index above, not here.

Science: foundations, permanence, CDR potential

  • Glaser et al. (2001). Terra preta as a model for tropical agriculture. Naturwissenschaften. 10.1007/s001140000193
  • Lehmann, Gaunt & Rondon (2006). Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change. 10.1007/s11027-005-9006-5
  • Lehmann (2007). A handful of carbon. Nature. 10.1038/447143a
  • Gaunt & Lehmann (2008). Energy balance and emissions of biochar vs bioenergy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/es071361i
  • Cheng et al. (2008). Natural oxidation of black carbon in soils. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 10.1016/j.gca.2008.01.010
  • Roberts et al. (2010). Life cycle assessment of biochar systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/es902266r
  • Woolf et al. (2010). Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nat. Commun. 10.1038/ncomms1053
  • Keiluweit et al. (2010). Dynamic molecular structure of biochar. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/es9031419
  • Spokas (2010). Biochar stability and O:C molar ratios. Carbon Management. 10.4155/cmt.10.32
  • Zimmerman (2010). Abiotic and microbial oxidation of biochar. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/es903140c
  • Major et al. (2010). Fate of soil-applied black carbon. Glob. Change Biol. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02044.x
  • Zimmerman et al. (2011). Positive and negative priming among biochar-amended soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.02.005
  • Cross & Sohi (2011). Priming potential of biochar and labile carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.06.016
  • Weng et al. (2017). Biochar built soil carbon over a decade by stabilizing rhizodeposits. Nat. Clim. Change. 10.1038/nclimate3276
  • Azzi et al. (2024). Modelling long-term biochar carbon storage from harmonized decomposition data. Geoderma. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116761
  • Weng & Cowie (2025). Gigaton-scale mitigation potential of biochar. Commun. Earth Environ. 10.1038/s43247-025-02228-x
  • Schmidt et al. (2025). Biochar permanence — a policy commentary. GCB Bioenergy. 10.1111/gcbb.70092

Production, contaminants, and testing (expanded 2026-09-16)

  • Keiluweit et al. (2010). Dynamic molecular structure of biochar. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/es9031419
  • Spokas (2010). O:C molar ratios and biochar stability. Carbon Management. 10.4155/cmt.10.32
  • Cornelissen et al. (2016). Kon-Tiki kiln emissions and char quality. PLOS ONE. 10.1371/journal.pone.0154617
  • Hansen et al. (2015). Gasification biochar as co-product. Biomass Bioenergy. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.11.010
  • Longendyke et al. (2022). PFAS thermal destruction review. Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts. 10.1039/D1EM00465D
  • McNamara et al. (2023). PFAS transfer to py-liquid. Environ. Sci.: Water Res. Technol. 10.1039/D2EW00677D
  • Winchell et al. (2024). PFAS through pyrolysis + thermal oxidation. Water Environ. Res. 10.1002/wer.11149
  • Rathnayake et al. (2025). PFAS fate in biosolids pyrolysis/co-pyrolysis. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 10.1016/j.jaap.2025.106970
  • Sørmo et al. (2023). PFAS decomposition and emission factors across contaminated organic wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131447
  • Hušek et al. (2024). Target PFAS and organic-fluorine removal from sludge and sand by pyrolysis. Biochar. 10.1007/s42773-024-00322-5
  • McNamara et al. (2026). Initial concentration and pyrolysis efficiency control solid PFAS removal. Water Environ. Res. 10.1002/wer.70352
  • Edirisinghe et al. (2026). Complementary analysis of fluorinated organics in biosolids-pyrolysis byproducts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10.1021/acs.est.5c17517
  • Sørmo et al. (2021). Activated-biochar stabilization of PFAS-contaminated soil. Sci. Total Environ. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144034
  • Holly et al. (2024). PFAS leaching from biosolids and mitigation with biochar in undisturbed columns. ACS ES&T Water. 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00414
  • EPA Method 1633A (2024), 40 PFAS in aqueous, solid, biosolids, and tissue matrices. PDF
  • EBC Guidelines 10.5E (2025-08-14). PDF
  • ANSI/ASABE/USBI S668 NOV2025ED. PDF · standardizes biochar lab testing
  • Phyllis2 biomass database. https://phyllis.nl/

Activated carbon comparison (added 2026-09-21; checked against Crossref)

  • Fitzer et al. (1995). Recommended terminology for the description of carbon as a solid (IUPAC Recommendations 1995). Pure Appl. Chem. 10.1351/pac199567030473 · Gold Book: activated carbon
  • Ippolito et al. (2020). Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar. 10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x
  • Gale et al. (2021). Physiochemical properties of biochar and activated carbon from biomass residue: influence of process conditions to adsorbent properties. ACS Omega. 10.1021/acsomega.1c00530 — a different paper from the mis-cited “Gale 2021” in the corrections table above (that one is Thomas 2021)
  • Mopoung & Dejang (2021). Activated carbon preparation from eucalyptus wood chips using continuous carbonization–steam activation process in a batch intermittent rotary kiln. Sci. Rep. 10.1038/s41598-021-93249-x
  • Wei & Li (2021). Wooden activated carbon production for dioxin removal via a two-step process of carbonization coupled with steam activation from biomass wastes. ACS Omega. 10.1021/acsomega.0c06032
  • Gęca et al. (2022). Biochars and activated carbons as adsorbents of inorganic and organic compounds from multicomponent systems: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102687
  • Alhashimi & Aktas (2017). Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: a meta-analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.016
  • Shaheen et al. (2022). Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass. Heliyon. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12388
  • Li et al. (2025). Life cycle sustainability assessment of activated carbon production technologies in China: coal-derived versus biomass-derived pathways. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c04447
  • Inyang & Dickenson (2015). The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: a review. Chemosphere. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.072
  • Pathy et al. (2023). Activation methods increase biochar’s potential for heavy-metal adsorption and environmental remediation: a global meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161252
  • Kabiri et al. (2026). Effect of physical, chemical, and biological aging on activated carbon and biochar properties and PFAS immobilisation in soils. J. Hazard. Mater. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.142258
  • Kookana (2010). The role of biochar in modifying the environmental fate, bioavailability, and efficacy of pesticides in soils: a review. Soil Research. 10.1071/sr10007
  • Clay et al. (2016). Maize, switchgrass, and ponderosa pine biochar added to soil increased herbicide sorption and decreased herbicide efficacy. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 10.1080/03601234.2016.1170540
  • Svejcar et al. (2024). A test of activated carbon and soil seed enhancements for improved sub-shrub and grass seedling survival with and without herbicide application. Plants. 10.3390/plants13213074
  • EPA (2024). Treatment options for removing PFAS from drinking water (fact sheet, April 2024). PDF
  • Verra VM0044 v1.2 clean text (effective 2025-06-27). PDF
  • Puro Biochar Methodology, Edition 2025 (version 2). PDF

Soil, yields, water and economics

GHG fluxes

  • Cayuela et al. (2013). Biochar and denitrification in soils. Sci. Rep. 10.1038/srep01732

  • Cayuela et al. (2015). Molar H:C_org ratio as a key factor in N₂O mitigation. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.015

  • Jeffery et al. (2016). Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.021

Nutrients and biochar-based fertilizers

Composting

Microbes and soil biology

Product standards and commercial products

Carbon markets — Puro.earth (primary)

  1. Puro Biochar Methodology Edition 2025 v2 PDF — https://7518557.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/7518557/Puro%20Biochar%20Methodology%20-%20Edition%202025%20%28version%202%29%20-%20For%20Publication.pdf (approved 2025-11-27)
  2. Puro Biochar Edition 2025 transition plan — https://7518557.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/7518557/Biochar%20Public%20Consultation%202025/03_Methodology%20Transition%20Plan%20for%20Biochar%20Edition%202025.pdf (2025-08-10)
  3. Puro permanence science — https://puro.earth/insights/post/biochar-permanence/ (2025-07-03)
  4. Puro retail use methodology update (R3 / v2) — https://puro.earth/insights/post/354-puro-earth-biochar-methodology-update-a-collaborative-step-forward-for-retail-use/ (2025-12-03)
  5. Puro CORC indexes — https://puro.earth/buy-carbon-credits/removal-certificate-corc/carbon-removal-indexes/
  6. Puro fees / supplier journey — https://puro.earth/certified-carbon-credits/fees/
  7. Puro Standard overview — https://puro.earth/cdr-infrastructure/methodologies/puro-standard/
  8. Puro Registry — https://registry.puro.earth/
  9. Puro document library — https://puro.earth/document-library
  10. Puro persistence model (GitHub) — https://github.com/puro-earth/PuroBiocharPersistenceEdition2025
  11. Puro Validation & Verification Requirements v1.3 — https://7518557.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/7518557/Supplier%20Documents/Validation%20and%20Verification%20Requirements%20v1.3.pdf
  12. Puro CORC page — https://puro.earth/buy-carbon-credits/removal-certificate-corc/
  13. Puro Microsoft CORC post — https://puro.earth/insights/post/microsoft/
  14. Puro half-decade post — https://puro.earth/insights/post/puro-celebrates-half-a-decade/
  15. ICVCM confirms Puro CCP-Eligible (program v4.2+) — https://www.icvcm.org/integrity-council-confirms-carbon-crediting-program-puro-earth-as-ccp-eligible/ (2025-12-11)
  16. Nasdaq acquires majority stake in Puro.earth — https://ir.nasdaq.com/news-releases/news-release-details/nasdaq-acquires-emerging-carbon-removal-market-puroearth (2021-06-01)
  17. Fortum launches Puro marketplace (2019) — https://www.fortum.com/en/media/2019/04/worlds-first-marketplace-co2-removals-launched-reverse-climate-change
  18. Fortum partners with Nasdaq on Puro (2021) — https://www.fortum.com/en/media/2021/06/fortum-partners-nasdaq-accelerate-growth-carbon-removal-marketplace-puroearth

Vault Puro cluster: Puro.earth Overview · Puro CORC200+ · Puro Biochar Methodology Edition 2025 · Puro Project Cycle and MRV · Puro Pricing and CORC Indexes · Puro vs Other Standards

Carbon markets — other methodologies and registries

  1. Verra VM0044 v1.2 — https://verra.org/methodologies/vm0044-biochar-utilization-in-soil-and-non-soil-applications-v1-2/ (active 2025-06-27)
  2. Verra minor revision — https://verra.org/verra-publishes-minor-revision-to-biochar-methodology/ (2025-06-27)
  3. ICVCM CCP decision M43 VM0044 v1.2 — https://icvcm.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/M43_VCS_VM0044_v1.2_2025.pdf (Board 2025-07-24)
  4. Verra ICVCM endorsement announcement — https://verra.org/verras-biochar-and-forest-management-approaches-endorsed-by-icvcm-as-high-integrity-solutions/
  5. Isometric Biochar Protocol v1.3 — https://registry.isometric.com/protocol/biochar/1.3
  6. Isometric Soil Storage Module v1.3 — https://registry.isometric.com/module/biochar-storage-soil-environments/1.3
  7. CSI Global Biochar C-Sink 3.3 — https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000039EN.pdf (2026-06-09)
  8. CSI formulas & emission factors PDF — https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000115EN.pdf
  9. CSI matrix positive list — https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000078EN.pdf
  10. CSI Global Biochar C-Sink service page — https://www.carbon-standards.com/en/standards/service-501~global-biochar-c-sink.html
  11. Global C-Sink Registry — https://global-c-registry.org/
  12. CSI Global Artisan C-Sink 2.1A — https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000136EN.pdf
  13. CSI CS-BCR 0.7 (EU CRCF) — https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000289EN.pdf
  14. ICVCM CSI Global C-Sink program application — https://icvcm.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Global-C-Sink-Copy-of-application_2026_05_18.pdf
  15. EBC Standard 10.5E — https://www.carbon-standards.com/docs/transfer/4000093EN.pdf
  16. EU Delegated Reg. 2026/285 — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32026R0285

Vault CSI cluster: CSI Global Biochar C-Sink · CSI Overview · CSI GPC vs SPC Permanence Classes · CSI MRV and Emission Portfolio · Product Standards EBC IBI

Market data — trackers and indexes

Market data — deal primary sources

Vault market cluster: Market Hub · Market Volumes and Pricing · Buyers and Offtakes · Historical Deals · Price Indexes and Benchmarks · Supply Landscape · Durable CDR Quality Tiers

Vault entry points

Verra VM0044 & Isometric deep-dive (2026-09-16)

Research dumps (box): /workspace/biochar-research/verra-vm0044-deep-dive.md, /workspace/biochar-research/isometric-biochar-deep-dive.md.

Vault notes: Verra VM0044 · Isometric Biochar Protocol · Verra vs Isometric vs Puro

CSI / EBC C-Sink deep-dive (2026-09-16)

Research dump (box): /workspace/biochar-research/csi-c-sink-deep-dive.md. Local PDFs: /workspace/biochar-research/csi-pdfs/.